Office in Bogotá, Colombia

When the Colombian Peso Gets Stronger, Who Pays?

One number made me stop this week: COP 3,126.08 to the US dollar.

That was Colombia’s official exchange rate on September 8, 2026. On the comparable date a year earlier, one dollar was worth COP 3,991.09. In other words, a dollar now buys about 21.7% fewer Colombian pesos than it did a year ago.

If you are building or already managing a nearshore team in Colombia, that movement matters. But it does not mean that every Colombian employee suddenly became 21.7% more expensive. The real effect depends on one very practical question: Which parts of your arrangement are priced in pesos, and which are priced in dollars?

That distinction is often missing from the nearshoring conversation.

The short answer

A stronger Colombian peso can raise the dollar cost of a salary fixed in Colombian pesos, reduce the local purchasing power of compensation fixed in US dollars, or squeeze the margin of a service provider that earns dollars and pays its costs in pesos.

It does not affect every nearshore contract in the same way.

For companies with teams in Colombia, the right response is not to panic or immediately search for the next low-cost market. It is to understand the currency exposure inside the current model, test the budget at several exchange rates, and make sure the partnership still works for the company, the provider and the people doing the work.

What changed in practical terms?

Here is the movement using the official rates published for September 8 in 2025 and 2026:

Exchange-rate snapshot September 8, 2025 September 8, 2026 Change
Colombian pesos per US dollar COP 3,991.09 COP 3,126.08 21.7% fewer pesos per dollar
COP value of a USD 10,000 payment COP 39.91 million COP 31.26 million COP 8.65 million less
USD cost of a COP 10 million salary USD 2,506 USD 3,199 27.7% higher

These are simple currency conversions. They exclude statutory employment costs, benefits and service fees, but they show why the contract structure matters so much.

Three nearshore models, three different effects

1. The employee’s salary is fixed in Colombian pesos

Imagine that an employee earns a gross salary of COP 10 million per month and the client pays the dollar equivalent each month.

At the September 2025 rate, that salary converted to roughly USD 2,506. At the September 2026 rate, it converted to roughly USD 3,199. The salary did not change for the employee, but the client’s dollar cost increased by about 27.7% before benefits, employer contributions and fees.

This is the most direct way a stronger peso can increase a foreign company’s nearshore budget.

2. A contractor is paid a fixed amount in US dollars

Now take a contractor whose rate stays at USD 3,000 per month.

At COP 3,991.09 per dollar, that payment converted to about COP 11.97 million. At COP 3,126.08, it converted to about COP 9.38 million. The client still pays USD 3,000, but the contractor receives about COP 2.60 million less in local-currency terms.

That is not a line-item increase for the buyer. It is a retention and compensation issue. If the situation continues, the contractor may reasonably ask for a rate review or look for a better-paying opportunity.

3. A nearshore provider bills in dollars and pays its team in pesos

In this model, the customer’s USD invoice may not change at all. The pressure sits with the Colombian provider.

A USD 10,000 invoice converted to about COP 39.91 million at the September 2025 rate and COP 31.26 million at the September 2026 rate. That is COP 8.65 million less revenue in local-currency terms, while salaries, benefits, taxes, recruitment and operating expenses continue to be paid in pesos.

The provider then has three broad choices: absorb the difference, reduce investment in salaries and service, or discuss pricing with the client. None is easy. This is why a fixed USD rate does not automatically mean the underlying economics are stable.

Why has the Colombian peso strengthened?

Currency markets rarely move for one reason. Banco de la República reported that the peso appreciated significantly against the US dollar during the second quarter of 2026 and outperformed regional peers. It linked the movement to a mix of external and Colombian factors, including lower domestic risk aversion, higher oil prices during part of the quarter and attractive interest-rate differentials.

The honest answer is that nobody can promise where the exchange rate will be six or twelve months from now. A nearshore plan that only works at one favorable rate is therefore not a very resilient plan.

Colombia’s value was never just a currency discount

This is the part of the discussion I find most important.

If Colombia only makes sense when the peso is weak, then the business case was built on currency arbitrage rather than a talent strategy.

Cost still matters. Buyers have budgets, and providers need sustainable margins. But the value of a Colombian team also comes from day-to-day working-hour overlap with North America, direct communication, technical experience, regional business knowledge and the ability to build continuity inside a product or operation.

Colombia’s technology economy is not a side story, either. DANE reported that the country’s ICT sector generated COP 58.1 trillion in gross value added in 2025, up 5.5% from 2024. Banco de la República has also highlighted the growing role of service exports in Colombia’s external economy.

Those fundamentals do not disappear because the exchange rate moves.

What does disappear is the illusion that “cheaper” is a permanent competitive advantage.

What should companies with nearshore teams in Colombia do now?

1. Map the currency exposure before discussing rates

Ask your provider or internal finance team to show you:

  1. the currency used for the employee’s salary;
  2.  the currency used for statutory costs and benefits;
  3. the currency used on the client invoice;
  4. how and when exchange rates are applied; and
  5. who currently carries the gain or loss when the peso moves.

Without those answers, it is impossible to know whether you have a cost issue, a margin issue or a retention issue.

2. Ask for a transparent cost breakdown

A single hourly rate hides too much. You should be able to distinguish compensation, Colombian employment costs, the provider’s service fee and any currency adjustment.

Transparency makes a pricing conversation more constructive. It also helps you see whether an increase reaches the team or simply adds margin.

For a fuller view of salary, statutory benefits and employer contributions, see our guide to the real cost of hiring employees in Colombia.

3. Stress-test the budget

Do not build next year’s plan around today’s spot rate. Model the same team at several exchange rates, such as COP 3,000, COP 3,500 and COP 4,000 per dollar.

You do not need to predict the market. You need to know what you would do in each scenario.

4. Agree on a fair review mechanism

Daily repricing creates noise. Ignoring a major currency movement for a full year can create a painful correction.

A better arrangement is a scheduled review with an agreed exchange-rate band or moving average. The mechanism should be clear and symmetrical: if the peso strengthens, the parties know how costs will be reviewed; if it weakens, the same logic still applies.

5. Protect the people, not only the spreadsheet

Passing all currency risk to an individual contractor may keep the buyer’s invoice flat for a while, but it can quietly damage motivation and retention. Replacing a strong team member also carries a cost through recruitment time, lost context and slower delivery.

Compensation conversations should consider local purchasing power, market pay, performance and the sustainability of the whole arrangement. The exchange rate is one input, not the employee’s scorecard.

6. Measure the value the team creates

Compare more than hourly rates. Look at delivery speed, ownership, communication, rework, retention and the amount of management attention the team needs.

The cheapest team on paper can be expensive to operate. A team that understands the product and solves the right problems can remain valuable even when the currency discount becomes smaller.

Does nearshoring in Colombia still make sense?

Yes, it still makes sense for many companies. But the case should be tested role by role and team by team.

Colombia remains a strong option when you need close working-hour overlap, capable professionals and a team that can become part of the business rather than sit at the edge of it. A stronger peso may narrow the savings for some employment models, but it does not erase those operating advantages.

The companies that will handle this moment best are not the ones that chase the lowest rate from country to country. They are the ones that understand their cost structure, pay people fairly and build a nearshore model that can survive normal currency volatility.

That is a much stronger foundation than “we are cheaper.”

Frequently asked questions

Not automatically. The dollar now buys about 21.7% fewer pesos than it did on the comparable September 2025 date, but the effect on a company depends on how salaries and invoices are denominated. A COP salary converted monthly into USD becomes more expensive in dollars; a fixed USD contract may leave the client’s invoice unchanged while reducing the contractor’s local income or the provider’s margin.

The two percentages use different starting points. The exchange rate moved from COP 3,991.09 to COP 3,126.08 per dollar, a 21.7% decline. Converting the same COP salary back into dollars requires dividing by the new, smaller number, which produces a 27.7% increase in its USD value.

There is no single answer for every model. Local employees, contractors and outsourced teams have different contractual and compliance considerations. What matters is that the currency, conversion method, review dates and allocation of FX risk are explicit before the team starts.

Nobody can know with certainty. Exchange rates respond to interest rates, commodity prices, risk sentiment, policy decisions and global market conditions. Companies should use scenarios rather than a single forecast.

An exchange-rate move alone is rarely enough reason to disrupt a productive team. Compare the likely savings with the full cost of transition. That cost includes recruitment, onboarding, lost knowledge, management time and delivery risk. If the team still performs and the cost remains sustainable, improving the current commercial model may create more value than starting again elsewhere.

A more resilient way to build in Colombia

At Globedesk, we help companies understand the full cost behind a Colombian hire and choose a structure that fits their team. The decision should not depend only on the exchange rate on the day the contract is signed.

If you are reviewing an existing budget or planning a new team, explore our LATAM nearshore solutions or contact us for a transparent cost scenario.

Sources

All calculations in this article are Globedesk calculations based on the official rates below. Figures are rounded for readability.

  1. Superintendencia Financiera de Colombia. “Tasa Representativa del Mercado (TRM).” Official rate of COP 3,126.08 per USD, valid September 5 to 8, 2026. View official TRM data
  2. Dirección de Impuestos y Aduanas Nacionales (DIAN). “Detalle de TRM.” Official rate of COP 3,991.09 per USD, applicable from September 8, 2025; source identified by DIAN as Superintendencia Financiera de Colombia and Banco de la República. View the historical rate
  3. Banco de la República. “Financial Markets Report, Second Quarter of 2026.” Discussion of the peso’s appreciation and contributing market factors. Published August 12, 2026. Read the report
  4. Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística (DANE). “Cuenta satélite de las tecnologías de la información y las comunicaciones (CSTIC), 2023 to 2025.” Official ICT sector value added data, updated March 27, 2026. View the DANE statistics
  5. Banco de la República. “Colombia’s Foreign Trade Basket of Goods and Services: Recent Trends.” Report to Congress, published March 31, 2026. Read the analysis